8xbet1

Lame Duck: What It Means and how It Works

What is a Lame Duck?

Lame duck is an out-of-use British term used with reference to a trader who had defaulted on their obligations or gone bankrupt due to an inability to cover trading losses.

Key Takeaways

  • Lame duck was a British term used to describe members of the London Stock Exchange who were unable to meet their claims on settlement day.
  • Such traders were described as lame ducks because they waddled out of the exchange alley.
  • A lame duck could not trade again until all their debts had been settled and paid.

Understanding Lame Duck

The phrase "lame duck" can be traced to the London Stock Exchange. A member who was unable to meet their claims on settlement day was described as a "lame duck" and would lose their membership on the exchange.

One of the earliest recorded uses of "lame duck" appears in A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue, published in 1788. It describes a "lame duck" as an "Exchange-alley phrase for a flock jobber, who either cannot or will not pay his losses, or differences, in which case he is said to waddle out of the alley, as he cannot appear there again till his debts are settled and paid; should he attempt it, he would be hustled out by the fraternity."

The image of a financially injured trader waddling away from the exchange helps to illustrate how this colorful phrase came into usage. The terms bull and bear date from the same period.

The term "lame ducks" often appeared in newspaper accounts from the time, particularly when the market suffered losses. For example, this account recorded on July 19, 1787:
The Stock Exchange has not exhibited for these many years, such a scene as took place there this day, on the settling of accounts: there were no less than twenty-nine lame Ducks waddled out of the Alley! Their deficiencies amount to two hundred and fifty thousand pounds.
Eventually, "lame duck" found its way to the United States, where it first became a descriptor of an underfinanced business scheme. It has also described a politician who is ineffective, has chosen not to seek re-election, is ineligible to run for office again or has lost an election but is still in office until the election winner takes control of the office.
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Benjamin Bannister Turner. "," Page 109. S. Sonnenschein, 1891
  2. Francis Grose. "" S. Hooper, 1788.
  3. Francis Grose. "." S. Hooper, 1788.
  4. The Scots Magazine. "," Page 358. Murray and Cochran, 1787.
Take the Next Step to Invest
×
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.
m88bet mu88 casino fun88 wtf qh88 m88 cá cược trực tuyến